15 Feb 2022
By Solomon Brothers

Following recent amendments to the WA Building and Construction Act, claimants and respondents alike may be left asking how these changes will impact the Security of Payments Act (‘SOPA’) claim process. Building and construction law is a complex branch of law with numerous courts and tribunals. Consequently, Solomon Brothers advocate for adapting the approach to different claim types to best present your dispute. As the debut feature in the new Solomon Brothers’ ‘How To’ series, this article will provide useful tips on building the most effective SOPA claim or response.


Building an effective SOPA claim as a claimant

A hallmark of SOPA claims is that decisions are rapid and non-binding, made by adjudicators that are typically not lawyers, though are well-versed in construction contracts. The claimant in SOPA claims is disadvantaged by an inability to know the identity of the adjudicator until after the claim is filed. As such, the claim cannot be tailored to suit the decision-maker like it would be advised in other claim areas. Like all industry professionals, SOPA adjudicators are working on a tight schedule and are compelled to make rapid decisions. Hence, building a SOPA claim must take these factors into consideration and be clear and concise to maximise effectiveness.


5 tips to build a successful SOPA claim

  1. Make all claims as clear as possible
  2. Focus on the end-user by putting yourself in their position and, as you prepare the claim, think how easy it is to read
  3. Use every aid possible, including drawings, photographs, etc.
  4. Have the claim professionally printed, paginated, and tabulated (if possible and financially viable)
  5. Remember that fine details are important

Creating a compelling response to a SOPA claim

Respondents are provided the advantage of knowing who the adjudicator is, and are able to use this knowledge to modify their response towards the decision-maker. Respondents are restricted, however, by tighter time constraints than the claimant. For this reason, Solomon Brothers advise that respondents should construct their response early using the above process, with emphasis on conciseness and clarity.


Perth’s construction law specialists

Established in 1987, the Solomon Brothers law firm has a long history of achievement in diverse areas of law. Our Construction Law team is highly skilled with extensive industry experience, representing the epitome of our philosophy of achieving excellence. For first-rate assistance in all areas of construction law including SOPA claims, contact Solomon Brothers and get a competitive quote from our expert Construction Law Team today.


Download How to Build a SOPA Claim

Recent Insights

How To Build a Security Of Payments Act Claim and Response

Following recent amendments to the WA Building and Construction Act, claimants and respondents alike may be left asking how these...
Read More

Infrastructure expenditure affecting the Western Australian construction market

Over the last 12 months, there have been numerous reports of a skills shortage in the Western Australian building and construction industry – in both blue and white-collar sectors. While the current boom is nowhere near that of 2012, there are a number of factors making it more difficult to top up the Western Australian building and construction industry from outside sources.
Read More

Are you SOPA Ready?

This week (on 22 June 2021), amendments to the WA regime as set out in the Building and Construction Industry (Security of Payment) Bill 2021 were passed by both houses of WA Parliament and is currently awaiting formal assent by Governor. With a Western Australian security of payment regime set to undergo a root and branch overhaul, it is time to ask yourself: Am I SOPA ready?
Read More

Time Bars vs Estoppel: Valmont Interiors Case

At the heart of the appeal was the question of whether an estoppel would operate to prevent a party, which directed additional works outside the express contractual variation regime, from bringing those works back within the contractual variation regime and then using the time bar provisions of that regime to bar the claim.
Read More

Notes on Boilerplate Terms of Contracts Impacting Construction Disputes

This is a short article regarding two dissimilar cases, both of which focus attention on the fact that the boilerplate terms of contracts can have a significant impact on the conduct of construction disputes.
Read More

Commercial Leases in Western Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Acknowledging small business, including the retail sector, have been hard-hit during the COVID-19 pandemic, changes to commercial tenancy laws in WA are providing some relief through what is defined as this “emergency period”. Solomon Brothers partner, Chris Williams, provides a summary of these legislative changes and their impact on both landlords and tenants.
Read More

When Worlds Collide: Indemnities Vs Limitations of Liability

While the usual caveats that apply to the impact of decisions refusing to grant summary judgment apply to NRW Contracting Pty Ltd v Cliffs Asia Pacific Iron Ore Pty Ltd [2020] WASCA 2020, there are at least important take-aways from the decision. The fact that it is a Court of Appeal decision also makes it worthy of note.
Read More

ASIC’s beef with Westpac over responsible lending duties

On 13 August 2019, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Liability Trial) [2019] FCA 1244 (“the Liability Trial”).
Read More

Commercial Rent Reduction Negotiation: Getting a great result for all parties

What to do when a commercial tenant asks for a rent reduction The starting point for a landlord is to...
Read More

“Construct Only” Contract, but is it really?

  The phrases “construct only contract” and “design and build contract” are ubiquitous within the Australian construction and building industries....
Read More

Get in touch with our Construction Law Team


Partner Litigation