16 Aug 2022
By David Marsh
Building Defects – How and When to Make a Claim

Building Defects – How & When to Make a Claim

Unfortunately, building and defects go hand in hand. Whether you are the owner of the building built or a subsequent purchaser – you will face defects. So how do you deal with them, what are your options and what are the barriers to recovery?

Where you engaged the builder, your best option for full recovery will almost always be under the building contract itself; although, in certain circumstances, you can make claims under the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 to the Building Commissioner (Building Complaint), or through the Courts for negligence and even breaches of consumer legislation, primarily the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

Lodging A Building Complaint

As a general rule, especially for homeowners, the most cost-effective and user-friendly option would be to make a Building Complaint. The Building Commissioner can deal with the complaint, send it to conciliation or send it to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) – all of which are cost-effective solutions.

The SAT in particular utilises experienced builders as part of this process and has a group of well-trained mediators who have an excellent strike-rate in resolving building disputes. The SAT is also a good forum for unrepresented parties.

Contract Claims

While a claim under your building contract is most likely to yield the best outcome under Australian law, they generally have to be run in Courts or, for many home-build contracts, by arbitration. These can be more expensive routes (arbitration generally more so) and almost certainly will require legal assistance. However, for example, if you want the builder to provide you with something that you specifically included in the contract, then your best option might be a Contract Claim.

With respect to negligence and claims under the ACL, these again must be brought in Court (or arbitration) and carry more uncertainty than contract claims or Building Complaints. However, they may, for example, be used to bring a claim against someone who you did not have a contract with but the builder did, like an architect, subcontractor or consultant.

For subsequent owners, the only building defect claims possibly available may be a Building Complaint or a Negligence Claim. It is possible to get contract claims assigned to you but this is a case-by-case matter and not something that regularly happens – especially in the home building or residential apartment market.

Making A Claim Against Building Defects - Solomon Brothers

Latent Defects

Irrespective of which avenue you might choose, one of the most frustrating problems for building owners is that many building defects do not materialise until well after the building is completed. This is true for all kinds of building defects, be they home building defects or commercial building defects. These types of defects are known as Latent Defects.

The problem then is that the question as to whether the limitation period has expired or not will determine which avenue might be available, if any. Generally, most avenues to claim expire about six years after the building is completed. However, in some limited cases for negligence and ACL claims you might have longer than six years.

Latent defects can even cause problems when selling a home if they are structural defects and are picked up by the purchaser’s building inspector. While the standard REIWA terms for the sale and purchase of property provide for this circumstance, it can be a nasty surprise for a seller and lead to some difficult decisions – especially where claims against the builder are no longer available because they are time-barred.

The Importance Of Timing

A well organised owner might schedule an inspection of the buildings at about five and half years after completion.  This should leave enough time for the owner to take action if latent defects are discovered during the inspection. While many home builders will carry out their own inspection prior to the 6 year mark, it remains in the owner’s interest to have an independent inspection undertaken. Indeed, rather than speaking to a lawyer first, if an issue arises, it is usually in the owner’s interest to speak to an expert.

Want To Know More About Building Defects?

If you have any questions regarding building defects, contract claims or our Construct Law services, please do not hesitate to contact David Marsh on 9282 5888.

We have extensive experience in a vast array of defective workmanship and design from major energy and resources projects, to residential strata developments and home building defects.


Recent Insights

Best Lawyers Recognition for Doug Solomon

We are pleased to share that our Doug Solomon has once again been recognised by Best Lawyers and, together with...
Read More

Unravelling Time-Bars – SOPA WA

As the dust slowly settles post the August 2022 introduction of WA’s new SOP Act, we’ve taken a bit of...
Read More

How To Make Your Contract Terms Stick

If you're involved in drawing up contracts but not an expert in Contract Law, our article below will assist you....
Read More

Building Defects – How & When to Make a Claim

Unfortunately, building and defects go hand in hand. Whether you are the owner of the building built or a subsequent...
Read More

How to Respond to a Statutory Demand

In this article, we explain what a statutory demand is, the legal consequences of receiving one, and how you can...
Read More

How To Build a Security Of Payments Act Claim and Response

Following recent amendments to the WA Building and Construction Act, claimants and respondents alike may be left asking how these...
Read More

Infrastructure expenditure affecting the Western Australian construction market

Over the last 12 months, there have been numerous reports of a skills shortage in the Western Australian building and...
Read More

Are you SOPA Ready?

This week (on 22 June 2021), amendments to the WA regime as set out in the Building and Construction Industry...
Read More

Time Bars vs Estoppel: Valmont Interiors Case

At the heart of the appeal was the question of whether an estoppel would operate to prevent a party, which...
Read More

Notes on Boilerplate Terms of Contracts Impacting Construction Disputes

This is a short article regarding two dissimilar cases, both of which focus attention on the fact that the boilerplate...
Read More

Get in touch with our Construction Law Team

DAVID MARSH

Partner Litigation

JIM ZEAKIS

Senior Associate